Ever fired up your code editor and felt like you needed a pilot's license just to write some HTML? Yeah, me too.
I love VS Code. Honestly, I do. But sometimes coding in it feels like trying to write a poem while sitting in mission control at NASA. Every action came with a price tag of system resources. Paste a line of code? Wait 10 seconds. My laptop fan? Sounding like it was preparing for liftoff.
That's why I built Quill Editor, a lightweight code editor for people who just want to write code without their computer staging a protest. Here's how it happened.
The Spark: When Your Editor Becomes the Obstacle
Picture this: You open your editor to make a quick fix. Five files. Two hundred lines of code. Should be simple, right?
Except your editor is busy. Background linting. Workspace indexing. AI suggestions you didn't ask for. Extensions checking for updates. Your status bar is lighting up like a Christmas tree, and all you wanted to do was change a variable name.
I found myself wanting something different:
- Open folder
- Create file
- Type code
- Save
- Repeat
No ceremony. No overhead. Just the essentials.
That frustration became the seed for Quill Editor. If you've ever felt stuck between feature bloat and your need to just get things done, you might appreciate The Hidden Costs of "Simple" Features, where I dig into why software keeps getting heavier over time.
The Philosophy: Less Is More (And Faster)
Right from the start, I made some rules for myself:
No background processes. Your editor shouldn't be doing things you didn't ask for. No secret indexing, no silent linters eating CPU cycles in the background.
Only essential features. Syntax highlighting? Yes. File management? Absolutely. AI assistants and fifty keyboard shortcuts for obscure commands? Hard pass.
Focus on calm productivity. The editor should fade into the background. Your code should be the star of the show.
The goal was simple: create a space where you could think clearly without your tools demanding attention. This connects to ideas I explored in The Myth of Future-Proof Architecture, where I talk about solving for now instead of every hypothetical future scenario.
Why Electron? (Yes, Really)
I chose Electron with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Before you roll your eyes about Electron being bloated, hear me out.
Modern UI capabilities. I could build exactly the interface I wanted with web technologies I already knew. Custom themes, flexible layouts, all with CSS.
Cross-platform from day one. Write once, package for Windows, macOS, and Linux. No platform-specific code gymnastics.
Familiar tech stack. I didn't want to spend six months learning a new framework before writing my first line of editor code.
Yes, Electron bundles Chromium. But here's the thing: without heavy background processes, language servers, and extension ecosystems running wild, the overhead is manageable. We're not building VS Code here. We're building something deliberately smaller.
The Early Days: When Reality Bites Back
Nothing in software development goes according to plan. Here are some of the early challenges that kept me up at night:
The Mysterious Vanishing Text
Large files would open with the first few lines missing. And the last few lines. Just... gone. Only the middle section appeared.
Hours of debugging later, I traced it to how I was handling the scroll viewport. The editor was rendering only the visible portion but calculating the boundaries wrong. Fixed, but humbling.
The Layout Paradox
I started with this grand vision of creating an entirely unique interface. Custom everything. Revolutionary design.
Then I used it for a day and hated it.
Turns out, most developers already have muscle memory for the VS Code layout. Sidebar on the left, tabs across the top, editor in the middle. It's familiar because it works.
So I swallowed my pride and "borrowed" heavily from VS Code's layout. Sometimes pragmatism beats originality. Designing Systems for Low Traffic explores this same principle: build for your actual needs, not theoretical ideals.
The Feature Creep Temptation
Early builds had buttons everywhere. Actions for everything. Toggle this, customize that. The UI was overwhelming.
I had to keep asking myself: "Does this serve the core mission of calm, focused coding?" Most of the time, the answer was no. Out it went.
What I Deliberately Left Out
Here's what Quill Editor doesn't have, and won't have:
Integrated terminal. Use your system terminal. It's better anyway.
Extension marketplace. No plugin system means no compatibility nightmares, no security concerns from third-party code, no performance degradation from poorly written extensions.
AI assistants. They're useful, but they belong in specialized tools, not in every editor by default.
Deep customization. You get themes and basic preferences. That's it.
The only "maybe" on my roadmap is minimal Git integration. Just enough to stage, commit, and push. Everything else? That's what the terminal is for.
Performance Means Something Different Here
When people talk about editor performance, they often mean benchmarks. Milliseconds per keystroke. RAM usage graphs.
I care about those things, but I define "fast" more personally:
- Startup time: How long from clicking the icon to typing code?
- Typing latency: Does each keystroke feel instant?
- Paste speed: Can I paste a chunk of code without waiting?
- System impact: Is my laptop fan silent while I code?
On those metrics, Quill Editor delivers. My computer doesn't sound like it's trying to achieve flight while I'm editing JavaScript. That alone is worth it.
Who This Editor Is For
Quill Editor is first and foremost for me. It solves my problem of wanting a distraction-free coding environment.
But I put it on GitHub because maybe you have the same problem. Maybe you're tired of heavyweight editors too. Maybe you just want to open a file and write code without ceremony.
If that sounds like you, welcome. Fork it, use it, submit pull requests if you want. The MIT license means you can do whatever you want with it.
Current State and What's Next
Right now, Quill Editor has:
- File tree view with folder navigation
- Tab-based file editing
- Syntax highlighting for common languages
- Basic file operations (create, delete, rename)
- Clean, distraction-free interface
Coming soon:
- Minimal Git UI for staging and committing
- Shallow autocomplete (closing HTML tags, bracket matching)
- Better keyboard shortcuts
What I'm not planning:
- Everything else
This isn't a roadmap designed to compete with established editors. It's focused on maintaining simplicity while adding just enough convenience to make coding pleasant.
Code Example: The Core Editor Setup
Here's a simplified look of hiw i initialized my editor(see full code on GitHub link at the end of this read file path /editor/editor.js)in Quill:
getCursorPosition() {
return {
start: this.textarea.selectionStart,
end: this.textarea.selectionEnd
};
}
setCursorPosition(start, end = start) {
this.textarea.selectionStart = start;
this.textarea.selectionEnd = end;
this.textarea.focus();
}
getLineAtCursor() {
const cursorPos = this.textarea.selectionStart;
const textBeforeCursor = this.textarea.value.substring(0, cursorPos);
const lines = textBeforeCursor.split('\n');
return lines[lines.length - 1];
}
getCurrentLineNumber() {
const cursorPos = this.textarea.selectionStart;
const textBeforeCursor = this.textarea.value.substring(0, cursorPos);
return textBeforeCursor.split('\n').length;
}
// Auto-indentation on new line
handleNewLine() {
const cursorPos = this.textarea.selectionStart;
const textBeforeCursor = this.textarea.value.substring(0, cursorPos);
const currentLine = textBeforeCursor.split('\n').pop();
// Count leading spaces/tabs
const indentMatch = currentLine.match(/^(\s*)/);
const indent = indentMatch ? indentMatch[1] : '';
// Insert new line with same indentation
this.insertText('\n' + indent);
}
}
// Initialize when DOM is loaded
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
const textarea = document.getElementById('codeEditor');
const overlay = document.getElementById('syntaxHighlight');
if (textarea && overlay) {
window.codeEditor = new CodeEditorCore(textarea, overlay);
}
});
Simple. Effective. No fancy abstractions getting in the way.
Lessons: The Value of Restraint
Building Quill Editor taught me something important: not everyone needs every feature.
Some developers thrive in richly featured environments with autocomplete, inline documentation, integrated debugging, and AI pair programming. That's great. Those tools have their place.
But some of us just need a quiet place to write code. A tool that stays out of the way. An editor that doesn't make you think about the editor.
There's a broader lesson here about software design. We often build for hypothetical future needs instead of current actual needs. We anticipate every possible use case and add features "just in case."
But complexity has a cost. Every feature is a maintenance burden. Every option is a decision users must make. Every background process is CPU cycles not available for your actual work.
Sometimes the best solution is the one that does less, not more. If this resonates with you, check out TidyUp: From "Disk Full" Panic to a 10x Faster Cleanup Tool, where I share a similar journey of building focused tools that solve specific problems well.
Final Thoughts
Quill Editor isn't trying to replace VS Code, or compete with Sublime Text, or dethrone any established editor. It's my answer to a personal need: a calm, focused coding environment that doesn't fight me for system resources.
It's a reminder that you can build software that does less and still be valuable. That minimalism isn't about deprivation but about intentionality. That sometimes the best feature is the one you leave out.
If you want distraction-free coding without your laptop preparing for takeoff, give it a try.
Try It Yourself
Check out the project on GitHub and see if it fits your workflow:
The codebase is simple enough to understand in an afternoon. Fork it, customize it, make it yours. That's what open source is for.
And if you build something cool with it, or just want to share your thoughts on minimalist development tools, I'd love to hear about it.
Related Articles:
- The Myth of Future-Proof Architecture - Why building for hypothetical futures often backfires
- The Hidden Costs of "Simple" Features - Understanding the real price of complexity
- TidyUp: From "Disk Full" Panic to a 10x Faster Cleanup Tool - Another tool born from frustration
- Designing Systems for Low Traffic - Building for actual needs vs theoretical scale
Share your thoughts in the comments below....